<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jesal gadhia &#187; design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jesal.us/tag/design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jesal.us</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ugly and Popular</title>
		<link>http://jesal.us/2007/05/ugly-and-popular/</link>
		<comments>http://jesal.us/2007/05/ugly-and-popular/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 08:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jesal.us/blog/2007/05/14/ugly-and-popular/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I&#8217;ve come to a realization: A web site doesn&#8217;t have  to have to have a slick Web 2.0ish look to be popular.
Just look at some of the most popular web sites:

Craigslist
Wikipedia
Google
PlentyOfFish
MySpace
Orkut

All of those websites have a very down-to-earth or in some  cases downright clumsy design. But it doesn&#8217;t matter, I think the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I&#8217;ve come to a realization: A web site doesn&#8217;t have  to have to have a slick Web 2.0ish look to be popular.</p>
<p>Just look at some of the most popular web sites:</p>
<ul>
<li>Craigslist</li>
<li>Wikipedia</li>
<li>Google</li>
<li>PlentyOfFish</li>
<li>MySpace</li>
<li>Orkut</li>
</ul>
<p>All of those websites have a very down-to-earth or in some  cases downright clumsy design. But it doesn&#8217;t matter, I think the key is  content, especially user generated content. If you have the right content then  the people will come. Also this ties in with my previous post about The Delphi  Effect. We are seeing more and more of it and that&#8217;s the thing of the future.</p>
<p>  Secondly besides the content, those sites are welcoming.  They have a casual feel to it. You could compare it with a departmental store  analogy. If you are walking down the 7th Avenue in New York, you are less likely  to think that you&#8217;ll find a good deal or at least something cheap in one of the  stores compared to let&rsquo;s say Wal-Mart or Ross.</p>
<p>I don&rsquo;t know if this was an intended strategy while they  made those sites but it definitely seemed to work out quite well.
 </p>
<p> Vitamin has a very <a href="http://www.thinkvitamin.com/features/design/the-myspace-problem">interesting  article</a> discussing this phenomenon and Robert Scoble has also <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2006/03/04/the-role-of-anti-marketing-design/">touched  upon this topic</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jesal.us/2007/05/ugly-and-popular/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
